It’s making fun of idiots who believe in bullshit ideas and sit back, expecting their god to do all the work. Atheism is nothing but a disbelief in all deities, and that is what these comic strips are representing.
What is atheism’s starting point? What is non-theistic worldview’s foundation? Assumptions of biased and new-age philosophers as opposed to objective evidence?! Atheism = pitiable fallacy
Atheism believes that matter created mind. But if mind is not a logical necessity to create anything functional or creative, then molecules (not people) should have randomly come together to form the Empire State Building. Likewise, you don’t think that the dictionary developed due to an explosion in a printing press!
Atheism says that “nothing” created the universe and everything in it and there is no such a thing as a “cause” which resulted in the effect. Atheism’s starting point of morality is based on biased personal preferences rather than objective moral laws. Can it get more ridiculous
Atheism says that “nothing” created the universe and everything in it and there is no such a thing as a “cause” which resulted in the effect. What is stupid?.. to believe “nothing” created the universe, mankind etc or an intelligent mind created the universe and its laws?
i think i can safely speak on behalf of many Atheists in saying that nothing did not create somthing: the laws of physics did. The universe is quite possibly the result of a quantum fluctuation based on the unertainty principle. Both theories explain the resulting universe, however ours evolves with observation and predicts with much more accuracy the state of the world. (it also adheres to occam’s razor) For much of my life i also beleived in the cause and effect of the universe, but if you still do you clearly don’t know much about entanglement, especially entangled time. our foundation is science. there may be no evidence against god, but you can never prove the nonexistance of somthing. and the lack of evidence against something does not give a reason to beleive. if no one can see the effects, whats the point of studdying it?
and like you say, matter creating mind makes little sense. but guess what? i accept that as a scientific challenge that i would like to see solved. it does not make me invent devine beings to explain things. are you not comfortable with accepting things you dont know? atheism says nothing about morality, only that there is no god. this is good. the existance of god makes pleasing god the goal of morality. without god, morality is allowed to be what the definition of morality is: to let the least suffering occur. god confuses morality. especially when god gives specific rules to be followed without concern for their outcomes. in terms of morality, science helps people make moral choices much better than religion. this is because science promotes finding correct information and using valid logic to make choices. religion promotes neither. if there were such a thing as a devil child that threatened to kill us all, then yes, the moral decision would be to kill him or her. however they do not exist so the information is flawed. when you pick up the phone and your cat dies, and you get rid of your phone, the information is correct, but not the logic. what is correct or logical about god sending himself to himself to save himself from himself? how does that help people make moral decisions?
thank you for saying all that king lear to the moron with complete lack of logic and correct information who called themselves not a puppet of atheists. there r some reasoned philosophical arguments for the existence of god, but unfortunately you know none of them. make sure you actually know what you’re on about before you start bullshitting.
Neutral Views
May 10, 2010 @ 19:01:00
what? so is this makign fun of athiests or the opposite…..?
Greenworld
May 10, 2010 @ 20:11:16
It’s making fun of idiots who believe in bullshit ideas and sit back, expecting their god to do all the work. Atheism is nothing but a disbelief in all deities, and that is what these comic strips are representing.
erer
May 10, 2010 @ 20:11:45
HAHA!!
Shaun
Oct 24, 2010 @ 03:03:14
Hahahah athiests are gay
Tanis
Dec 02, 2010 @ 04:51:56
Seeing as how this was making fun of theologians – look it up, I know it’s a big work for you – um…what?
Bill Pivnik
Dec 11, 2012 @ 17:33:06
Hahahah athEIsts can spell
Fuckjesus
May 08, 2011 @ 12:47:58
Jesus was a faggot
Cam
Jul 16, 2011 @ 08:20:08
Hahaha Shaun is schezophrenic and/or retarded
Not a puppet of atheists
Nov 05, 2011 @ 12:53:40
Atheism
What is atheism’s starting point? What is non-theistic worldview’s foundation? Assumptions of biased and new-age philosophers as opposed to objective evidence?! Atheism = pitiable fallacy
Atheism believes that matter created mind. But if mind is not a logical necessity to create anything functional or creative, then molecules (not people) should have randomly come together to form the Empire State Building. Likewise, you don’t think that the dictionary developed due to an explosion in a printing press!
Atheism says that “nothing” created the universe and everything in it and there is no such a thing as a “cause” which resulted in the effect. Atheism’s starting point of morality is based on biased personal preferences rather than objective moral laws. Can it get more ridiculous
Atheism says that “nothing” created the universe and everything in it and there is no such a thing as a “cause” which resulted in the effect. What is stupid?.. to believe “nothing” created the universe, mankind etc or an intelligent mind created the universe and its laws?
king lear
Nov 11, 2011 @ 14:29:08
i think i can safely speak on behalf of many Atheists in saying that nothing did not create somthing: the laws of physics did. The universe is quite possibly the result of a quantum fluctuation based on the unertainty principle. Both theories explain the resulting universe, however ours evolves with observation and predicts with much more accuracy the state of the world. (it also adheres to occam’s razor) For much of my life i also beleived in the cause and effect of the universe, but if you still do you clearly don’t know much about entanglement, especially entangled time. our foundation is science. there may be no evidence against god, but you can never prove the nonexistance of somthing. and the lack of evidence against something does not give a reason to beleive. if no one can see the effects, whats the point of studdying it?
and like you say, matter creating mind makes little sense. but guess what? i accept that as a scientific challenge that i would like to see solved. it does not make me invent devine beings to explain things. are you not comfortable with accepting things you dont know? atheism says nothing about morality, only that there is no god. this is good. the existance of god makes pleasing god the goal of morality. without god, morality is allowed to be what the definition of morality is: to let the least suffering occur. god confuses morality. especially when god gives specific rules to be followed without concern for their outcomes. in terms of morality, science helps people make moral choices much better than religion. this is because science promotes finding correct information and using valid logic to make choices. religion promotes neither. if there were such a thing as a devil child that threatened to kill us all, then yes, the moral decision would be to kill him or her. however they do not exist so the information is flawed. when you pick up the phone and your cat dies, and you get rid of your phone, the information is correct, but not the logic. what is correct or logical about god sending himself to himself to save himself from himself? how does that help people make moral decisions?
IAm
Sep 02, 2012 @ 20:28:40
thank you for saying all that king lear to the moron with complete lack of logic and correct information who called themselves not a puppet of atheists. there r some reasoned philosophical arguments for the existence of god, but unfortunately you know none of them. make sure you actually know what you’re on about before you start bullshitting.
Eddie Cosmos
Dec 08, 2012 @ 05:37:21
I particularly liked the one about the new CEO. Says it all really.
Anonymous
Mar 08, 2016 @ 11:10:17
[url=http://www.ooobrand.com/bags/hermes/2250.html]フランス語で「舷窓」を意味するブランド名通り、ウブロスーパーコピーはビス留めのベゼルをシンボルとする時計界の風雲児的なブランドです。1980年創業の新しいブランドで、デビュー早々ゴールドケースにラバーストラップを組み合わせるという当時としては”常識破り”の「スポーツ1520」を発表し、一大センセーションを巻き起こしました。その最初の顧客が軍事クーデターで国を追われた元ギリシャ国王コンスタティノス2世であったことも、伝説的な語り草です。キッチュとも言える組み合わせの妙は、正当的な高級時計に飽きた王族などの上流階級に大人気となり、ウブロ時計コピーは”王の時計”とも呼ばれました。 フュージョン=融合をコンセプトとするウブロは、その後も伝統的な時計作りと革新的な発送を融合させて”常識破り”のウォッチを発表し続けています。ゴールドとラバーの組み合わせが他社に追随されると、今度はタンタリウムのケースにチタンのビス、タングステンの自動巻ローターといった仕掛けを施し、さらには文字盤も目盛りも針も真っ黒という「オールブラック」モデルで意表をつくなど、常にスーパーコピー腕時計の世界に新風を吹き込んでいます。[/url]
Anonymous
Mar 08, 2016 @ 11:12:06
[url=http://www.bagkakaku.com/vuitton_bag/2/N51207.html]これはsevenfridayシリーズで私の問題である。この音はセンセーショナルかもしれないとして、私はシリーズの古典であったと思っています。それはそれとして崇拝して非常に軽蔑されるかもしれません、しかし、それに耐えた。その価格の点で、そのように見えるのは、それがその生産実行上の数千と何千もの特徴のコレクションに設定されている。その影から踏み出すとき、単に、sevenfriday sevenfridayシリーズその先駆者に接続するために何かをしました。彼らが、何sevenfriday 01シリーズv 3で明らかなように、同一のパターンレイアウトを次のリリース計画、シェアードソースからインスピレーションをとって、各シリーズの各モデルを用いた ガガミラノスーパーコピー 。で、シリーズは、1、2、3の各々と、それぞれに触発された産業の本質によって、産業革命、産業用エンジン。これは、消費者は各々の以降のシリーズが好きになったのですdnaのいくつかの表現かもしれないが、多くのバリエーションが期待できる手段(または憎しみ)は、以前のリリース。それが意味するもののために人々と女の子は、sevenfridayプレスリリース文書で請求されたラインの下の宣伝の年を維持するのにかなり創造的になるだろうということです。[/url]
Anonymous
Mar 08, 2016 @ 11:14:26
[url=http://www.brandiwc.com/brand-7-copy-0.html]”日本一流ヴィトン コピー、ヴィトン コピー 激安(N品)専門店、全国送料無料、ヴィトン コピー 通販,ヴィトン コピー商品,ヴィトン コピー 販売,当サイト販売したヴィトン コピーなので正規品と同等品質提供した格安で完璧な品質のをご承諾します、当サイトは最高級ヴィトン コピー激安通信販売店です ホームページをクリックして商品をご覧下さい.ロレックスコピー,業界No.1人気スーパーコピーロレックス腕時計専門販売ブランド サングラス 、ブランドコピー、ルイ ヴィトン サングラス、サングラス コピー、シャネル サングラス、グッチ サングラス、コーチ サングラス、D&G サングラス、偽物 サングラス 、激安 サングラス 韓国 人気 楽天市場 モンクレール 代引き 海外ブランド コピー ダミエ 偽者 ルイヴィトンコピーグッチコピーエルメスコピーロレックスコピーカルティエコピーオメガコピーブルガリ コピー 時計スーパーコピーも多彩な品揃えでお待ちしています。スーパーコピー,ブランドコピー,コピーブランド,シャネルコピー ブランド商品は信頼と安心のお店、ベルメゾンネットで[/url]